Trudeau Thinks You’re Racist Because You Don’t Want To Get Vaccinated

Did you know that being unvaccinated is a symptom of racism? I didn’t realize it either, but don’t worry; Canada’s supreme political doctor, Justin Trudeau, just discussed this very issue on Quebec television.*


His verdict?


1. “We all know people who are deciding whether or not they are willing to get vaccinated, and we will do our very best to try to convince them. However, there is still a part of the population (that) is fiercely against it.”


2. “They don’t believe in science/progress and are very often misogynistic and racist. It’s a very small group of people, but that doesn’t shy away from the fact that they take up some space.”


3. “This leads us, as a leader and as a country, to make a choice: Do we tolerate these people? Over 80% of the population of Quebec have done their duty by getting the shot. They are obviously not the issue in this situation.”


Trudeau’s uneducated, unethical, segregationist, language is symptomatic of a morally ambiguous man with concerning ideological sympathies. Nonetheless, his points are easy to counter, not because we’re smarter than him, but because his ideas are irrational. For example,

  1. Trudeau said in point 1., “…there is still a part of the population (that) is fiercely against it.” That’s true—more people in Canada are vaccinated than not. But that population of dissent amongst the vaccinated is growing, primarily because you [Trudeau] lie more and more even as your narrative collapses in on itself.

  2. In point 2. he said, “… are very often misogynistic and racist.” This is pure, unfettered, nonsense. I might as well say, “They [unbelievers] don’t believe in Christianity and are very often 6’’4 in height.” Mr. Trudeau traps himself in the embarrassing fallacy that correlation implies causation. In reality, a refutation of that fallacy is one of the most elementary lessons a college student learns in his introductory courses. More than that, where does Mr. Trudeau conjure the ridiculous notion of correlation between racism and vaccines at all? Will he dare produce evidence proving it? Of course not, so how can he claim there’s correlation? You and I certainly don’t observe one.

  3. His ominous threat, “Do we tolerate these people?” is an important one. It reveals the heart of the Liberal Government. For the moment, our rulers who fashion themselves benevolent, wise, and generous, leaders, “tolerate” the free-thinkers who question bureaucratic actions. But for how much longer? How much longer will the “loving and progressive” disciples of Trudeau tolerate us?


Not much longer at all.


But before the Federal and Provincial Governments threaten to vaccinate us by coercive force, point #2 in Mr. Trudeau’s interview telegraphs their current strategy. It is parallel with the tactics of almost every radical leftist I’ve encountered—slander and shame.

The radical’s strategy to break and make us captivate to their will is simple but effective:


  1. Demand you do something (like getting vaccinated).

  2. You don’t want to do it.

  3. Publicly shame you until your disgrace is too heavy to bear any longer, and you obey the mob in a plea to make the persecution stop.

No one wants to be labelled a racist. It’s a title reserved for those who act more reptile than man, but for someone who’s done absolutely nothing to warrant the accusation, it’s cruel and unjust. By calling the unvaccinated “racists, selfish, stupid, crazy, conspiracy theorists,” the radical left works their hardest to exercise their “tolerance” and force men to conform to their demands.


For too long, we’ve stood with dignified silence and allowed this barrage of slander to assault our persons. But with a New Year comes new resolutions.


If we grant Mr. Trudeau the dignity of his appalling claims and let him escape with speaking such foul language, it’s implicitly implied that Trudeau is justified to claim such radical connections.


He’s not.


We cannot, and will not, stay a silent majority any longer because “anyone who is not against you is for you” (Luke 9:50) Refusal to speak against our Prime Minister's communist-tinged speech means we agree with it. If a neighbour, classmate, or co-worker calls us “racist” or “misogynistic” because we don’t agree with everything they do, it’s no longer appropriate to sit in silence.


Instead, with respect, fearlessness, and sincere firmness, we must rebuke that language and demand they immediately redact the lie. We are not racists, cruel neighbours, or mean co-workers. We’re people who simply want, “To live his life in his own way, to call his house his castle, to enjoy the fruits of his own labour, to educate his children as his conscience directs, to save for their prosperity after his death—these are wishes deeply ingrained in civilised man.”*


Should we fail to defend these rights, disaster will follow.


Thank you for reading! If you'd like to support our site and the work we do, click here! Thank you so much for your kind generosity!


If you’d like to stay informed about the Christian's perspective of current events, or if you’d like to join our growing community of members who love truth, subscribe here for free!


*See the full story and all quotes at the Western Standard here!

**See C.S Lewis, Willing Slaves of the Welfare State here

0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
Subscribe To The Newsletter

To read the latest articles about current events, receive newsletters, and get prayer requests, join our growing community of members who love and defend truth, for free!

Thanks for submitting!